“During the oral argument presented by the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Joseph Sellers, Chief Justice John Roberts asked if it was “true that Wal-Mart’s pay disparity across the company was less than the national average.” The implication seemed to be that, if Wal-Mart’s disparity was lower, accusations of discrimination had less merit. But the existence of a larger discrimination should not excuse incidents of lesser injustice.”
-
-
You want a cookie for being less sexist than most people?